Do You Support Lowering
the Drinking Age?
I was simply stunned to read about a news report a couple of days ago, that some nuts who happen to be US college presidents and chancellors, and who belong to a group called Amethyst Initiative, have actually proposed to the US law makers to lower the national drinking age from 21 years to 18 years.
As soon as I read the report my blood started boiling. I was going to head straight to my online diary to write a piece about it, blasting these college presidents for their stupidity. But I had to control myself because I figured that I was so angry, if I wrote right then my piece would be full of all kinds of profanities which is certainly not desirable, though I still want to call those college presidents at least SOB’s.
The college presidents are supposed to be responsible people. They are shaping the future of the country by correctly shaping our college going young generation and guiding them to the right direction.
Underage drinking, binge drinking, drinking and driving, these are known problems in our American society, especially amongst students. To stop young people from drinking, the legislators have clearly specified the minimum drinking age as 21 years in the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984. Obviously, young college students break the law all the time and indulge in drinking, often binge drinking. It is upto the colleges and universities to enforce the law, and punish those who break the law. This policing is not easy. It takes a lot of initiative, man-power, and money to keep things the way it should be. Obviously the college presidents are seeking the easy way out. Since most college students are at least 18 years, the college presidents think if they can lower the drinking age to 18, there will be no problem with the law if the college students drink. They are clearly trying to avoid their responsibilities of enforcing the law. (This will probably motivate the high school principals to demand that legal drinking age should be lowered to 16 years!)
I hope the college presidents who signed this petition of lowering the drinking age, do not have children of their own who are under 21. Because if they do, there is a good chance that they will lose their children in car crashes due to drinking and driving, if their petition is approved.
I know many young people, who might read this piece, will curse me, shower profanity at me. I don’t care. If it were left to me, I would have raised the drinking age to 30 years. Nobody should be allowed to drink until he/she is matured, because responsibility comes only with maturity. And in my opinion maturity does not really come until one is at least 30.
I also know that the above opinion of mine is too strict and most people will not agree with me. And since I shall never be the deciding authority, I am willing to adhere to the current law – you have to be at least 21 to drink. But 18? No way!
Underage drinking is irresponsible, it is against the law, it is a crime, and it often results in fatality. Filing for officially lowering the drinking age is also equally irresponsible. No right thinking person should support it.
For the record, the initative has been criticized by several groups and government and industry officials, including Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the American Medical Association (AMA), and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Mothers Against Drunk Driving said in a press release that lowering the drinking age would result in greater numbers of fatal automobile accidents, and that the presidents are "misrepresenting science and looking for an easy way out of an inconvenient problem." I cannot agree more with MADD.





















Recent Comments